Front Street Wealth Management

Fee Only, Proactive Wealth Managment

  • Our People
  • Let’s Talk
  • Articles
  • Clients
    • Client Login
    • Schedule Meeting

Yes, Fiduciary Duty Matters

April 6, 2016 by Jason P. Tank, CFA, CFP, EA

Senator Elizabeth Warren is onto something with her recent letter to the SEC about fiduciary duty.

As a fee-only, fiduciary-bound investment adviser, I wholeheartedly agree that my clients’ interests should always be placed ahead of other competing interests.

This fiduciary duty mindset is not universal in my industry.

In too many circumstances, advisers who hold themselves out as financial service providers for their clients are not duty bound by a fiduciary obligation to their clients.

Instead, a certain subset of professionals in the financial services industry are held to a simpler and, I believe, lower, standard of “suitability”, rather than a fiduciary duty.

In other words, many non-fiduciary duty bound advisers only need to offer products and services that are only just suitable enough for their clients.

Following this suitability standard may invariably lead to higher compensation to them or their firms and higher costs to their clients. That’s okay, as long as what’s been offered to them is suitable enough.

In contrast, the fiduciary-bound adviser has a higher hurdle to leap in their dealings with clients and the public.

In the linked article, Senator Warren is right to point out the contradictory statements of some companies in the financial services industry.

My belief is that all advisers should uphold and practice as fiduciaries to their clients. Investment advisers, like my firm, are required by law to be fiduciaries at all times and under all circumstances when they provide services to their clients.

It’s simple to do and, more importantly, simply the right thing to do.

Click image to read…

Fiduciary Duty Matters

Self-Defeating Fed Speak

April 4, 2016 by Jason P. Tank, CFA, CFP, EA

After reading dovish remarks from Fed chair Janet Yellen last week, these comments from another Fed governor stand in stark contrast. 

It begs the question if the Fed believes that its primary tool is its ability to manipulate expectations for interest rates in the future through the power of its words, this type of cross-talking between officials certainly doesn’t help in that policy tool. 
Rosengren to markets: You have it all wrong on rate hikes http://www.cnbc.com/id/103518094

Resting Hopes on Central Bankers

March 31, 2016 by Jason P. Tank, CFA, CFP, EA

After yet another violent market swoon and snapback, it is entirely possible investors are resting their hopes on a flawed belief.

The first quarter of 2016 displayed a range of emotion that could shake even the most rational of investors.

The first six weeks of 2016 saw stocks rapidly decline, at one point down around 10% to 15%. While the depth of the decline could reasonably be described as normal, the speed was certainly sudden. On the flipside, the market’s recovery over the second half of the quarter has been equally quick.

Today, in fact, most stock market indexes now hover around the zero line year-to-date. No gain and only the fading memory of pain.

It was quite a ride that no doubt favored investors who were either blind or deaf or internet-free, as it has since the recovery began in 2009. Contemplation and preparation has not been rewarded.

To begin the year, investors began anticipating the negative effects of the Fed’s move off of zero interest rates. That concern, coupled with the fact that the economy is still showing only subdued growth and corporate profits have been in decline, investors were quick to cry wolf.

As soon as their cries rang out, central bankers in Europe, Japan and China all responded with more easy money. In fact, describing it as easy money may be an understatement with a large portion of all government debt across the globe now trading at negative yields. Yes, unbelievably, negative interest rates require the investor to pay the borrower for the privilege to lend!

Following suit, our own central bank has consistently backed down the expectations for rate hikes this year and next.

It’s almost ironic that the Fed started to raise rates in December, citing a healthy enough economy to start “normalizing policy”, as they say. Now, growth has stalled out once again, as it’s done repeatedly.

Regardless, my observation is investors don’t care as much about economic growth or even profit growth as they do about the underlying support of central bankers.

The quick market bounce in mid-February almost perfectly coincided with a doubling down of promises of lower rates for longer and more asset purchases around the globe.

Investors reaction to promises of easy money reminds me of the long held belief that objects of different weight – a bowling ball and a feather – fall at different rates.

For thousands of years, this flawed belief was seen as an universal truth by the academic elite. That is, until Isaac Newton showed what other non-academics knew long before, all objects are affected by gravity just the same.

Are investors simply buying into a similarly flawed and long-held belief that central bankers and low rates will always be there to rescue them? We shall see, but I’m placing my bet on gravity.

Time to Tidy Up Your Finances

March 21, 2016 by Jason P. Tank, CFA, CFP, EA

The recent best-selling book, The Life-Changing Magic of Tidying Up, argues that life’s better when you eliminate your clutter. I believe the exact same principle applies to your financial life.

As you look at your pile of shoes, tools or warily peer into your messy closets, it’s no surprise your things get lost so easily. Too often, partially due to a distaste for all things related to money, people similarly neglect their finances.

If this describes you, your benign neglect may lead to costly and avoidable mistakes.

Over the years, I’ve noted two common habits that lead to financial disorder.

First, many people have too many investment accounts. It results in a cornucopia of accounts and the situation is overwhelming.

This type of shotgun approach – to just open accounts all over town and never look back – creates a situation that is often unmanageable for a normal person. And, as a general rule, what is unmanageable most often remains unmanaged. In the world of investments, I can assure you, that’s not a good thing.

People living in this disorganized state also have little idea about their overall investment allocation and the level of risk they are taking with their money. With their piles of unopened envelopes and email notices growing, they often don’t know their mix of stocks, bonds or cash. There are simply too many accounts and it literally stops them from moving forward with a strategic investment plan.

Second, failing to periodically clean out your financial closet can result in costly estate and tax planning mistakes.

For example, neglect can lead people to fail to update their beneficiary designations as their life situation changes, such as a divorce, death or having a new child. The benefits of good tax planning concerning your heirs can be large and to inadvertently throw them away is unfortunate, to say the least.

Another example is for those who have successfully completed basic estate planning moves – through the creation of trusts or other methods. Having to keep track of too many moving parts naturally lead to a failure to execute on the plan. When you don’t actually fund your trusts or properly designate your payable-on-death directives for your various accounts, all the planning in the world is wasted effort and can lead to avoidable expenses for your loved ones.

A good financial adviser will work to better organize your financial life. Helping you tidy up your affairs is one of their core functions to help you gain confidence with your overall financial strategy and plans. An uncluttered home – and an uncluttered financial life – invariably leads to an uncluttered mind. It might even feel, dare I say, life-changing.

Investment Costs Add Up

March 10, 2016 by Jason P. Tank, CFA, CFP, EA

Occasionally, I experience disappointments as an investment adviser. It comes with the territory as I get to see behind the curtain of the financial services industry. It saddens me to report, when it happens, it’s often not a pretty sight.

An individual recently came to me for advice about his IRA account. After years working with an adviser, his gut told him he needed another set of eyes to take a look. His hunch was right. In a nutshell, the investment expenses he was paying were outrageously high.

The primary lesson is, you should periodically conduct your own review. It’s not difficult to do. The savings you might find can add up to a substantial sum over time.

Casting the curtain aside, here’s what I saw.

First, this individual’s adviser charged him 1% of his account value per year for services that largely focused on investment management. He described to me a relationship that was very light on personalized financial planning. For that 1% fee, which isn’t uncommon, the delivered services shouldn’t be light on this front.

But, as they say, there’s more.

Next, his adviser chose to outsource his duties to another investment advisory firm. Outsourcing is also not uncommon in my industry, especially for advisers who either don’t have the professional skill or the inclination to actually manage their clients’ assets themselves.

However, as a prudent consumer, you should be very aware of the possible double-layer of expense an outsourcing decision creates. In this individual’s case, his adviser’s outsourcing added yet another cost of 1.25% per year.

Unfortunately, as bad as this might be, you guessed it, there’s more.

 Third, the outsourced investment adviser outsourced his work too. As part of their service, they chose to invest the money in various mutual funds that, together, added at least 0.75% per year in additional costs.

With the curtain fully drawn back, this individual incurred total expenses of roughly 3% per year. Expenses like these create a hurdle so high, few investors can ever get ahead. And, these expense layered cakes are not rare enough, especially for smaller investors who can afford them the least.

 Think about the math for a moment. With interest rates so low today and with the economy now entering its eighth year of recovery, future investment returns – after expenses like these – may indeed have a hard time staying in positive territory.

Learning how to analyze your investment costs is a skill worth developing.  

« Previous Page
Next Page »
  • Fee-Only
  • Fiduciary Duty
  • Risk Management
  • Financial Planning

© 2025 · Front Street Wealth Management | Form ADV | Privacy Policy | Disclosure